tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8955388713581848615.post8533372330432043474..comments2024-03-14T08:08:39.968+08:00Comments on The Shroud of Turin: Some Advice from Stephen Jones: My response to Dan PorterStephen E. Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16183223752386599799noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8955388713581848615.post-5689940207130062772014-04-27T19:43:34.593+08:002014-04-27T19:43:34.593+08:00bippy123
>Hey Stephen, Great post.
Thanks.
...bippy123<br /> <br />>Hey Stephen, Great post. <br /><br />Thanks.<br /><br />>I dont see why mentioning anyones names as possibly having a part in the c14 hacking means that their names are being defamed. <br /><br />As I understand it, the legal charge of defamation has three defences: 1) true; 2) in the public interest; and 3) not malicious.<br /><br />I claim all three. But if 1) fails, i.e. it turns out my proposal is false that Timothy W. Linick, aided by Karl Koch, were the hackers who duped the three C14 dating laboratories in their claim that the Shroud's C14 date is 1325 +/- 65; then 2) and 3) still apply. <br /><br />It definitely is in the public interest to find out how the C14 laboratories' got it wrong; and clearly I bear Linick no malice. <br /><br />>In shroud research we should be seeking the fullness of truth no matter what area we are researching. This is what true research is about.<br /><br />Agreed. But Dan Porter is evidently not interested in seeking the truth in this matter. He has from the beginning been against my proposal that: 1) the three C14 dating laboratories were duped by hacker(s); and 2) one of those hacker(s) was Timothy W. Linick.<br /><br />His prejudice showed in allowing me, a living person, to be continually defamed WITH MALICE on his blog; yet he deleted the names from my comments of Linick and Koch (the latter a self-confessed hacker who worked for the KGB) who have both been dead for ~25 years!<br /><br />>I think my next step is to start learning law since I have been accused by someone on Porters blog as being Mark Antonacci lol.<br /><br />You mean you aren't? :-)<br /><br />>I know if I was a lawyer I would be doing much better financiall than I am doing right now :)<br /><br />As a Christian you are richer in what matters most: treasure in heaven (<a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mt+6%3A19-20&version=ESV" rel="nofollow">Mt 6:19-20</a>).<br /><br />>Thank you again Stephen for being couragious in sticking to seeking the truth even against such verbal abuse.<br /><br />Thanks for your thanks. <br /><br />>If Mark Antonacci is reading thsi blog, I consider it an honor to be thought of as him :)<br /><br />He may read my posts, but probably not the comments under them.<br /><br />>Have a great weekend Stephen<br /><br />Thanks, I did (its Sunday night here in Perth, Western Australia). We went to church in the morning and in the afternoon I took my two young grandsons to see "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lego_Movie" rel="nofollow">The Lego Movie</a>". All three of us enjoyed it.<br /><br />>God bless <br /><br />He HAS by your comment!<br /><br />Stephen E. Jones<br />---------------------------------<br />Reader, if you like this my <a href="http://theshroudofturin.blogspot.com.au/" rel="nofollow">The Shroud of Turin </a> blog, and you have a website, could you please consider adding a hyperlink to my blog on it? This would help increase its <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank" rel="nofollow">Google PageRank</a> number and so enable those who are Google searching on "the Shroud of Turin" to more readily discover my blog. Thanks.Stephen E. Joneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16183223752386599799noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8955388713581848615.post-75932096760416318842014-04-27T14:47:36.657+08:002014-04-27T14:47:36.657+08:00Hey Stephen, Great post. I dont see why mentioning...Hey Stephen, Great post. I dont see why mentioning anyones names as possibly having a part in the c14 hacking means that their names are being defamed. In shroud research we should be seeking the fullness of truth no matter what area we are researching.<br /><br />This is what true research is about.<br /><br />I think my next step is to start learning law since I have been accused by someone on Porters blog as being Mark Antonacci lol.<br /><br />I know if I was a lawyer I would be doing much better financiall than I am doing right now :)<br /><br />Thank you again Stephen for being couragious in sticking to seeking the truth even against such verbal abuse.<br /><br />If Mark Antonacci is reading thsi blog, I consider it an honor to be thought of as him :)<br />Have a great weekend Stephen<br />God bless <br />Bippy123<br /><br />bippy123noreply@blogger.com