tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8955388713581848615.post1074201842335043033..comments2024-03-14T08:08:39.968+08:00Comments on The Shroud of Turin: Medieval photography: Nicholas AllenStephen E. Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16183223752386599799noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8955388713581848615.post-400912575551738972016-08-28T00:55:42.269+08:002016-08-28T00:55:42.269+08:00Anonymous
I deleted the above comment as sub-stan...Anonymous<br /><br />I deleted the above comment as sub-standard, but on second thoughts I will respond to it.<br /><br />>>" Shroud existed long before the 13th/14th centuries. Allen ignores all the evidence that the Shroud existed long before the 13th/14th centuries[76]."<br /><br />>Don't overstretch this topic.<br />It's time to stop writing about Nicolas Allen and his medieval photography theory and to write about something else now amigo.<br /><br />As my latest post, posted about 50 minutes ago says, "To be <i>concluded</i> in the nineteenth installment of this part #8 of my "Topics" series." That is, I will "stop writing about Nicolas Allen and his medieval photography theory" in the next day or two.<br /><br />But in general my response is simple: If you don't like what I write, then <i>don't read it</i>!<br /><br />As I have stated before, unlike <a href="https://shroudstory.com/" rel="nofollow">Dan Porter</a> did, I don't write my blog to court popularity. I write what I believe is <i>the truth</i> about the Shroud and <i>should be written</i>.<br /><br />I will write in my next concluding post, Allen has produced by far the best replication of the Shroud, being full-length, negative and three-dimensional (albeit weakly). But still it is hopelessly <i>inadequate</i>. <br /><br />So if Allen's "medieval photography" theory is wrong (which it <i>is</i>) then <i>all</i> Shroud forgery theories are wrong, and once again the Shroud <i>is</i> authentic! <br /><br />The bottom line is that whether my blog has 6 views a day (which it once had) or the current over 600 views a day, I will continue to write the same as I always have: without fear or favour. <br /><br />Stephen E. Jones<br />----------------------------------<br />MY POLICIES. Comments are moderated. Those I consider off-topic, offensive or sub-standard will not appear. Except that comments under my latest post can be on any Shroud-related topic. I normally allow only one comment per individual under each one of my posts.Stephen E. Joneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16183223752386599799noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8955388713581848615.post-69913221698201053482016-08-28T00:13:18.843+08:002016-08-28T00:13:18.843+08:00Anonymous
"Shroud existed long before the 13...Anonymous<br /><br />"Shroud existed long before the 13th/14th centuries. Allen ignores all the evidence that the Shroud existed long before the 13th/14th centuries[76]."<br /><br />Don't overstretch this topic.<br />It's time to stop writing about Nicolas Allen and his medieval photography theory and to write about something else now amigo.Stephen E. Joneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16183223752386599799noreply@blogger.com