tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8955388713581848615.post724704713600027708..comments2024-03-14T08:08:39.968+08:00Comments on The Shroud of Turin: Servant of the priest (1): Turin Shroud EncyclopediaStephen E. Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16183223752386599799noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8955388713581848615.post-60327075056091225602014-11-19T17:09:45.923+08:002014-11-19T17:09:45.923+08:00>... this was your last comment on this topic o...>... this was your last comment on this topic on my blog.<br /><br />That should have been, "this was your last comment on my blog" full-stop.<br /><br />Colin Berry remains permanently banned from my blog for repeatedly posting comments that flouted my stated policies about "off-topic, offensive or sub-standard" comments.<br /><br />See my comments under my 2012<br />post, "<a href="http://theshroudofturin.blogspot.com.au/2012/06/turin-shroud-is-fake-and-its-one-of-40.html" rel="nofollow">`The Turin Shroud is a fake ... and it's one of 40': Antonio Lombatti</a>."<br /><br />Up to and including <a href="http://theshroudofturin.blogspot.com.au/2012/06/turin-shroud-is-fake-and-its-one-of-40.html" rel="nofollow">my final comment permanent banning Colin</a> after I gave him <i>plenty</i> of warnings:<br /><br />>June 17, 2012 at 8:51 PM <br />Stephen E. Jones said...<br />><br />>>So Colin/Sciencebod, the ball is in your court. This is your first and final warning. From now on, if I have to delete one more of your comments because it does not comply with my stated policies, I will ban you permanently.<br />><br />>Colin responded with a substandard comment so he is now permanently banned from commenting on this my The Shroud of Turin blog.<br /><br />I now regret my lack of consistency in allowing Colin to post his recent comment claiming he was not "Weaving Fan."<br /><br />Stephen E. Jones<br />---------------------------------<br />Reader, if you like this my <a href="http://theshroudofturin.blogspot.com.au/" rel="nofollow">The Shroud of Turin </a> blog, and you have a website, could you please consider adding a hyperlink to my blog on it? This would help increase its <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank" rel="nofollow">Google PageRank</a> number and so enable those who are Google searching on "the Shroud of Turin" to more readily discover my blog. Thanks.Stephen E. Joneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16183223752386599799noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8955388713581848615.post-83498408846062830552014-11-14T08:56:11.504+08:002014-11-14T08:56:11.504+08:00Colin
>Two years ago you wrongly accused me, ...Colin<br /> <br />>Two years ago you wrongly accused me, Colin Berry aka sciencebod, of posting comments to your site under the pseudonym "Weaving Fan". I felt obliged to post a denial on my TS site, which you may or may not have seen.<br /><br />No, I don't read your blog. From what I had seen of it in the past, you are simply <i>self-deluded</i>, thinking you can prove the Shroud to be a fake by your tin-pot `experiments' while ignoring the MOUNTAIN of historical and artistic evidence of the Shroud's existence all the way back to the first century. <br /><br />Even Prof. Christopher Bronk Ramsey, Director of the Oxford radiocarbon dating laboratory, who as "C.R. Bronk" was a signatory to the <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ozywq5x" rel="nofollow">1989 <i>Nature</i> paper</a>, has admitted, "There is A LOT OF OTHER EVIDENCE that suggests ... that THE SHROUD IS OLDER THAN THE RADIOCARBON DATES ALLOW":<br /><br /> "There is a lot of other evidence that suggests to many that the Shroud is older than the radiocarbon dates allow and so further research is certainly needed. It is important that we continue to test the accuracy of the original radiocarbon tests as we are already doing. It is equally important that experts assess and reinterpret some of the other evidence. Only by doing this will people be able to arrive at a coherent history of the Shroud which takes into account and explains all of the available scientific and historical information." (Ramsey, C.B., 2008, "<a href="http://tinyurl.com/oazqxwc" rel="nofollow">Shroud of Turin</a>," Version 77, Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, 23 March).<br /><br />But for reasons given <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ozp8bs8" rel="nofollow">in my comments</a> under my 2012 post "<a href="http://tinyurl.com/pmthxdg" rel="nofollow">The Shroud of Turin: 2.1. A linen sheet</a>" I still believe you are "Weaving Fan."<br /><br />But if you aren't "Weaving Fan" then just <i>get over it</i>. You have said <i>far worse</i> things about me! "<a href="http://tinyurl.com/qjhuxuw" rel="nofollow">He who comes into equity must come with clean hands</a>." <br /><br />>Dan Porter, for reasons best known to himself, has just put up a posting that dredges up that sorry episode of mistaken identity and in a sense gives it new life and currency.<br /><br />I don't read Porter's blog either and I haven't done so since 8th May - over 6 months.<br /><br />Also, as I wrote <a href="http://tinyurl.com/kdqpgca" rel="nofollow">in a comment</a> under my post, "<a href="http://tinyurl.com/p5aa6oa" rel="nofollow">Turin shroud was made for medieval Easter ritual, historian Charles Freeman says</a>":<br /> <br />"... mentioning of Dan Porter, and his blog, and his blog's members in connection with Porter's blog, is henceforth off-topic on my blog."<br /><br />>It would be nice if you could do the decent thing and disabuse him of what was an over-hasty conclusion on your part. <br /><br />See above that: 1) I still think you were "Weaving Fan", 2) I don't read Porter's blog; and 3) "mentioning of Dan Porter, and his blog .. is ... off-topic on my blog."<br /><br />>It is not my style to adopt new pseudonyms, least of all troll other people's websites. <br /><br />Sorry Colin, but from your past repeated breaches of my blog's policies against "off-topic, offensive or sub-standard" comments (see above), which lead to your being banned permanently from making comments on my blog (I have made an exception of this comment so you could at least air your claimed grievance), I have no confidence in your assertions. <br /><br />For all I know, you could be just trying to enlist me to attack Porter on your behalf, to stir up further trouble between us, so you can sit back and laugh at both of us.<br /><br />Because: 1) you are banned from making comments on my blog; 2) comments about Porter and his blog are off-topic on my blog; and 3) commenters normally are allowed only one comment on my blog (see above); this was your last comment on this topic on my blog.<br /><br />Stephen E. JonesStephen E. Joneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16183223752386599799noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8955388713581848615.post-48214770551830966522014-11-14T06:54:07.222+08:002014-11-14T06:54:07.222+08:00Two years ago you wrongly accused me, Colin Berry ...Two years ago you wrongly accused me, Colin Berry aka sciencebod, of posting comments to your site under the pseudonym "Weaving Fan". I felt obliged to post a denial on my TS site, which you may or may not have seen.<br /><br />Dan Porter, for reasons best known to himself, has just put up a posting that dredges up that sorry episode of mistaken identity and in a sense gives it new life and currency.<br /><br />It would be nice if you could do the decent thing and disabuse him of what was an over-hasty conclusion on your part. It is not my style to adopt new pseudonyms, least of all troll other people's websites.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8955388713581848615.post-19093271248373838682014-11-08T00:38:59.713+08:002014-11-08T00:38:59.713+08:00Dan
>Hi Stephen. When are you going to finish ...Dan<br /><br />>Hi Stephen. When are you going to finish your series on hacking? People want to know. Regards. Dan Porter. <br /><br />Thanks for your and your members' interest.<br /><br />Hopefully when I finish this current "Servant of the priest" series.<br /><br />Stephen E. Jones<br />-----------------------------------<br />MY POLICIES <b>Comments</b> are moderated. Those I consider off-topic, offensive or sub-standard will not appear. Except that comments under my latest post can be on any Shroud-related topic without being off-topic. I normally allow only one comment per individual under each one of my posts.Stephen E. Joneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16183223752386599799noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8955388713581848615.post-30535198417726307462014-11-07T22:08:06.263+08:002014-11-07T22:08:06.263+08:00Hi Stephen. When are you going to finish your seri...Hi Stephen. When are you going to finish your series on hacking? People want to know. Regards. Dan PorterUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15165885924185456923noreply@blogger.com