Monday, April 23, 2012

Four proofs that the AD 1260-1390 radiocarbon date for the Shroud has to be wrong!: #2 The Vignon markings (5)

›
Continuing from part " #2 The Vignon markings (4) " with this part #2 (5) of my series " Four proofs that the AD 1260-1390 ra...
Tuesday, April 10, 2012

`De Wesselow fails to answer the reasons why rational people accept the Shroud is a fake'

›
Anonymous Thank you for your comment under my post, " My comments on a Telegraph article about Thomas de Wesselow's claim that the...
7 comments:
Monday, April 9, 2012

Proceedings of the 1986 Hong Kong Shroud Conference now online

›
[Image no longer online] Below is an email from archaeologist Prof. William Meacham, convenor of the Symposium, "Turin Shroud - Image o...
Thursday, March 29, 2012

My comments on a Telegraph article about Thomas de Wesselow's claim that the Shroud is authentic but Jesus was not resurrected #2

›
Continuing from part #1 with this part #2 of my comments (in bold ) on an article in The Telegraph about a book, " The Sign: The Shr...
11 comments:
Wednesday, March 28, 2012

My comments on a Telegraph article about Thomas de Wesselow's claim that the Shroud is authentic but Jesus was not resurrected #1

›
Here is part #1 of my comments (in bold ) on an article in The Telegraph on a book, " The Sign: The Shroud of Turin and the Secret of ...
4 comments:
Sunday, March 18, 2012

Four proofs that the AD 1260-1390 radiocarbon date for the Shroud has to be wrong!: #2 The Vignon markings (4)

›
This part "#2 The Vignon markings (4)" is a continuation from my part #2 (3) , of my series " Four proofs that the AD 1260-13...
23 comments:
Saturday, March 3, 2012

`I heard the Shroud image was made by a bas-relief metal sculpture heated'

›
This is my `fleshed out' response to an anonymous comment on my post " Four proofs that the AD 1260-1390 radiocarbon date for the S...
26 comments: